Published December 2010
Few management decisions carry as much impact as deciding who to hire. Hiring the right person results in a daily affirmation of your wise choice. A poor hire, on the other hand, requires an inordinate amount of attention and may eventually call for an unpleasant termination.
The hiring challenge is complicated by the fact that most candidates are on their absolute best behavior and so many true identities are well-hidden behind an interview façade. Nonetheless, there are time-tested techniques which greatly improve the odds of making a sound decision.
First of all, employing a team approach increases the likelihood of a quality decision. A team also tends to negate the potential for the decision being overly influenced by a sole interviewer’s halo effect which is a positive bias resulting from a single trait. For example, an interviewer’s assessment is positively biased towards the candidate because they attended the same school, belonged to the same sorority, were both Eagle Scouts, etc. If your organization is very small or you can’t involve co-workers in the hiring decision for whatever reason, form a small interview team of trusted colleagues from outside your business that understands your organization.
Gather the team together a couple of days prior to the interview to develop a game plan. Each interviewer should be assigned a couple of designated focus areas and encouraged to develop open-ended, thought-provoking questions which allow them to deeply evaluate the candidate in those areas.
What’s the source of these focus areas? They should be a direct reflection of your organization’s core values. Hiring new employees and evaluating current ones are the two primary activities for bringing core values to life. If core values are not key criteria in your hiring and evaluation processes, there’s a good chance that they are likely little more than ambiguous concepts framed on the wall.
Below are some interview techniques to consider:
An interview report out meeting with the team should be scheduled on the same day as the interview so that’s it’s still fresh in everyone’s mind. Avoid group think by asking each team member to come to the meeting with their recommendation on the candidate. A fun way to quickly assess responses is to have interviewers bounce their fist into their hand two times (a la paper-rock-scissors) and then cast their vote with a thumbs-up, down or sideways.
Any negative or neutral votes should be judiciously explored via discussion. Reaching team consensus prior to discounting any highlighted concerns is warranted before proceeding with an offer. This is because the interview setting may likely be the best you will ever see the candidate again. Countless managers have later lamented that an employee’s now glaring weakness was identified as a yellow light during the interview but rationalized away.
—
Back to the Working Great! archivesCheck out the Working Great! archives for columns on other pertinent business issues
Copyright 2009 Brimeyer LLC. All Rights Reserved.